About Astrology essays

About Astrology essays Astrology I dont believe in astrology at all, but before you can make a decision wether you believe in something or not you have to know exactly what it is. So first of all i have to define astrology. Astrology can be defined as the practice of mapping planetary positions for a given date, time and place for the purpose of determining correlations between celestial phenomena and events on earth. These configurations are then interpreted according to the context in which tehy apply. The most known terms concerning Astrology are the horoscope and the Zodiac or Sun sign. There are twelve Zodiac signs: Capricorn, Aquarius, Pisces, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio and Sagittarius. It depends on your date of birth which of these Zodiac signs is yours. Each of these signs are combined with certain traits. A horoscope can be drawn and then interpreted for an individual, a business, an event or even a country. You can find horoscopes in nearly every newspaper or daily journal. Most people are aware of their Zodiac sign which determines what horoscope you are tempted to read in the newspaper. My personal sign is Capricorn. It is said that capricorns are very determined peole that care a lot about their career. Although this is true, it could ebensogut be absolutely wrong. So it is just a coincidence if your own traits fit to these traits that are combined with you personal sun sign. To me these predictions to the future are absolutely nonsense. It is impossible to predict the future so all clairvoyants are charlatans that try to people in order to get money. Astrology is as many other kinds of an attempt of the human being to deal with the problem of existence. If a Fortuneteller tells me that i will meet the woman of my dreams or something like that, i will never believe it.i only believe in what is explainable. i` ...

Understanding Expressive Roles and Task Roles

Understanding Expressive Roles and Task Roles Expressive roles and task roles, also known as instrumental roles, describe two ways of participating in social relationships. People in expressive roles tend to pay attention to how everyone is getting along, managing conflict, soothing hurt feelings, encouraging good humor, and take care of things that contribute to one’s feelings within the social group. People in task roles, on the other hand, pay more attention to achieving whatever goals are important to the social group, like earning money to provide resources for survival, for example. Sociologists believe that both roles are required for small social groups to function properly  and that each provides a form of leadership: functional and social. Parsonss Domestic Division of Labor How sociologists understand expressive roles and task roles today is rooted in Talcott Parsons development of them as concepts within his formulation of the domestic division of labor. Parsons was a mid-century American sociologist, and his theory of the domestic division of labor reflects gender role biases that proliferated at that time and that are often considered traditional, though theres scant factual evidence to back up this assumption. Parsons is known for popularizing the structural functionalist perspective within sociology, and his description of expressive and task roles fits within that framework. In his view, assuming heteronormative and patriarchally organized nuclear family unit, Parsons framed the man/husband as fulfilling  the instrumental role by working outside the home to provide the money required to support the family. The father, in this sense, is instrumental or task-oriented he accomplishes a specific task (earning money) that is required for the family unit to function. In this model, the woman/wife plays a complementary expressive role by serving as the caregiver for the family. In this role, she is responsible for the primary socialization of the children  and provides morale and cohesion for the group through emotional support and social instruction. A Broader Understanding and Application Parsons conceptualization of expressive and task roles was limited by stereotypical ideas about gender, heterosexual relationships, and unrealistic expectations for family organization and structure, however, freed of these ideological constraints, these concepts have value and are usefully applied to understanding social groups today. If you think about your own life and relationships, you can probably see that some people clearly embrace the expectations of either expressive or task roles, while others might do both. You might even notice that you and others around you seem to move between these different roles depending on where they are, what they are doing, and who they are doing it with. People can be seen to be playing these roles in all small social groups, not just families. This can be observed within friend groups, households that are not composed of family members, sports teams or clubs, and even among colleagues in a workplace setting. Regardless of the setting, one will see people of all genders playing both roles at various times. Updated  by Nicki Lisa Cole, Ph.D.